I became familiar with Hitchens because of his book God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything. I won’t say I liked the book because I completely disagreed with Hitchens worldview, but I will say that the man had a power with words, using them to hone his rhetoric to a razor’s keen. I started reading his other works – essays in Slate, Vanity Fair, The Atlantic and other outlets – as well as catching some of the various YouTube videos that featured him.
Hitchens was that rare breed: as influential on the stage as on the page, and his voice (curiously the victim of his cancer) was a marvelous mixture of baritone and honey. Shoot, you add in his native accent, and there’s not a whole heck of a lot of people who wouldn’t sit in a room and listen to him read minutes from the last Congressional budget hearing. The man was that good.
I only saw him in person once. It was in Birmingham, Alabama, at the Birmingham Sheraton Hotel, hard by I-20 right in the heart of downtown. The event was a debate between Hitchens and noted mathematician David Berlinski, and it was hosted by Fixed-Point Foundation, a Birmingham-based Christian organization whose founder, Larry Taunton, had an interesting friendship with Hitchens. I went with some co-workers, and we took a seat on Hitchens’ side of the room, about six rows back.
He was pale and looked decidedly ill, his head without a hint of hair as the result of his chemo and other treatments. But somehow he still had presence, an uncanny ability to fill the room with his thoughts and words and voice. The crowd was decidedly pro-Hitchens, but the question up for debate (“Does Atheism Poison Everything?”) was directly in Hitchens’ wheelhouse; it was like throwing a 72-mph fastball down the middle to Albert Pujols. Bye-bye, see-you-later, here’s a souvenir to take home to the kiddies.
And poor Berlinski couldn’t keep up.
After the debate was over, we went to a restaurant in the hotel for a post-debate review. My colleagues and I discussed Hitchens’ strengths and weaknesses in the debate (there were far more of the former than the latter), and settled fairly simply on the conclusion that Hitchens had won in a rout.
That was when Hitchens walked by. He had a gaggle of gorgeous young people around him, each one holding his autobiography Hitch-22 (a good read) beneath their arms, each one giddy to be in his wake. The groupies trailed him all the way to the bar and formed an instant wall around the man as he ordered his drink.
It is well documented that Hitchens liked the recipe. Perhaps it lubricated his brain and vocal chords simultaneously, I don’t know. But as he stood there at the bar, chatting and signing books and trying to get a sip of something amber whenever he could, I turned to my colleagues and said, “When he comes back by, I’m gonna ask him what he drinks.”
“Why?” one of my friends asked.
“Because I just want to know,” I said.
I really can’t tell you why, other than this arcane idea that what a man drinks tells you something about his character. I think I read that in a Louis L’Amour novel once upon a time. Or maybe it was Hemingway. Probably L’Amour.
Sure enough, the ailing atheist walked past our table and I screwed up enough courage to follow him.
“Mr. Hitchens?” I called out.
He turned and looked at me, his face tired.
“I hate to bother you, but may I ask you a question?”
He gestured towards the elevator bank down the hall with his glass. “If you don’t mind asking it as I walk. It’s been a long night and I am very tired.”
“Certainly,” I said, and with that we were walking together towards the elevators.
“I would like to know what kind of whiskey you drink,” I said.
He looked at me. “Curiosity?”
He smiled. “Johnny Walker Black.”
“Why?” I asked. I guess I had expected something a little more…sophisticated. Some obscure scotch or something.
“Because,” he said, taking a sip from his glass, “it’s a good whiskey, smooth, with a nice finish. I enjoy it. And, I can find it almost anywhere in the world.”
“Aren’t there better whiskeys?”
“Certainly. But the best isn’t always available. Johnny Walker is.”
I nodded. I didn’t really have any other questions for the man, so I stuck out my hand. “Well, thank you for your time.”
“That’s it?” he asked as he shook my hand. “You’ve no other questions for me?”
“No sir. Thank you for your time.”
“Cheers,” he said, raising his glass to me. Just then, Larry Taunton came around the corner and took Hitchens the rest of the way to the elevators. I went back to my co-workers.
They all looked at me as I returned.
“Johnny Walker Black,” I said as I took my seat.
Someone asked why.
“Convenience,” I said. “It’s not the best, but he can always get it.”
Christopher Hitchens went to his grave denying the existence of God. He kept his word – there was no deathbed conversion, no last-minute Hail Mary to save his eternal soul. What he refused to believe in life he refused to believe in death. Somewhere, someone will write about his consistency of belief, and how it should be seen as a credit to the man.
I won’t write that. I think the man had a powerful mind, an even more powerful ego, and chose an unfortunate path, both for his whiskey and his worldview:
He simply took what was readily available instead of holding out for what was best.